"the HR advice we receive from AP is invaluable...clear, concise and very reliable" - Fox International Group Ltd

 

 

“I would have not a moment’s hesitation in recommending The AP Partnership to a friend, family member or business associate” Birmingham City Football Club

 

 

“provided timely, accurate and professional HR legal and procedural advice for twenty years” Fairline Boats Ltd

 

 

“practical, pragmatic, supportive…invaluable”  -  Beckett Investment Management Group

 

 

“We have found your expertise and advice to be invaluable” – Luminus Group

 

 

“Incredibly helpful above and beyond expectation”  - Ideal Home Shopping Plc

 

 

“The AP Partnership Ltd has over a 90% client retention rate”

Employers - contact our advisor for an informal discussion

Name:
Phone no.

Subscribe to our newsletter - join over 22,000 people who enjoy our monthly updates’

Name:

Email:

Client Login



Retirement Notifications
The EAT has handed down its decision in Howard v Campbell's Caravans, which is authority for the proposition that a notification to an employee that he will be retired "after his 65th birthday" does not necessarily constitute a failure to comply with the requirement of the statutory retirement procedure that the employee must be notified of the intended date of his retirement.

It was concluded that a notification letter has to be considered in isolation and further letters cannot remedy a failure to notify an employee of his retirement date. However, nor can they cast doubt on the validity of the original notification if they specify a different date.

On the facts of this case, a natural reading of the letter would cause an employee to conclude that he was to be retired on the date of his 65th birthday, even though he was retired two days later.